Advertisement
Journal Home
Search for

Volume 9, Issue 1, Page 1 (January 2010)

1 of 61 View next.

Long-Acting Opioid Prescribing Might Require Mandatory Training

ELIZABETH MECHCATIE

Article Outline

My Take

Fewer MDs May Prescribe Narcotics

Copyright

COLLEGE PARK, MD. — Special training in safe prescription of long-acting opioid drugs, as well as the use of patient-prescriber agreements, could be required to earn federal approval to prescribe such products, under proposals discussed by an industry working group.

The working group presented those and other options at a public meeting held Dec. 4 by the Food and Drug Administration. The meeting was part of an initiative to develop a class-wide risk evaluation and mitigation strategy (REMS) for long-acting opioid drugs.

The FDA last February informed manufacturers of long-acting opioid products that they would have to develop a single REMS for the drug class. The FDA wants to reduce the potential for abuse, misuse, overdose, and addiction associated with the products.

In one scenario, clinicians seeking Drug Enforcement Agency registration to prescribe schedule II controlled substances would beed to certify that they were trained to choose appropriate patients. Currently, no physician training is required for DEA registration. Giving the DEA such authority would require an act of Congress, according to one of the industry working group representatives.

“If some physicians would opt out of training, access to the drugs would be reduced for patients who need them,” said Dr. John Jenkins, director of the FDA's Office of New Drugs. The REMS program's goals are to assure that the drugs' risks don't exceed their benefits, while ensuring access for patients who need them, Dr. Jenkins noted during a press briefing after the meeting.

The drugs to be included in the REMS are brand name and generic products that contain fentanyl, hydromorphone, methadone, morphine, oxycodone, and oxymorphone.

The problems associated with those products include their use in patients who are nonopioid tolerant or otherwise inappropriately selected, as well as the drugs' misuse and abuse.

Short-acting opioid products are not included in the discussion. But meeting participants expressed concern that an effective REMS for the long-acting products could shift misuse and abuse to the shorter-acting agents.

Other ideas proposed by the group for the REMS included:

▸ A patient-prescriber agreement to facilitate discussion about the drugs.

▸ A medication-information sheet.

▸ Metrics to assess whether the REMS impedes patients' access to appropriate medication,

The working group made no conclusions at the meeting toward a final plan for the REMS.

Dr. Jenkins said he couldn't predict when the REMS would be finalized. But an FDA advisory panel will meet in the spring to discuss the elements of the proposed REMS, to solicit advice from experts, and to hear public comment, he added. Until a final REMS is approved, Dr. Jenkins said, the FDA will require an interim REMS for any other products in the drug class.


View full-size image.

The REMS program's goals are to assure that the drugs' risks don't exceed their benefits, while ensuring access.

DR. JENKINS


My Take 

return to Article Outline

Fewer MDs May Prescribe Narcotics 

The ‘training’ would be a major impairment to the care of patients as most of the physicians I have spoken to indicate they will not take the training and instead plan to simply stop prescribing the related drugs. The problem is that most of us do not use many narcotics. We all seem to have just a few patients requiring long-term narcotics. Most narcotic use in rheumatology is short term or limited long-term use (e.g., 20 tablets for 3-6 months).

The patient-prescriber agreement is very important and in use for several years, but is really only needed and in use for those patients with continuous long-term narcotics. It should be used by the physician practicing pain medicine, where use of narcotics is more frequent. It protects physicians.

The medication-information sheet is a good idea. It does not address the pharmacist's role. They provide information on all other drugs, why not narcotics? In many states, the pharmacist has access to computer records of narcotic prescriptions. They should notify physicians of misuse.

The imposition of ‘training’ and forms will neither retard addiction, or detect abuse by patients nor prescribing doctors. But it will add another layer of rules, making the practice of medicine more difficult, while hampering the physician's ability to provide patient care.

ROY ALTMAN, M.D., is professor of rheumatology and immunology at the University of California Los Angeles. He reports financial relationships with numerous drug companies.

PII: S1541-9800(10)70001-6

doi:10.1016/S1541-9800(10)70001-6

1 of 61 View next.